RE: Booming Curations Cases - Nepotism is on Trending.
Hello dear brother @bountyking5 brother.
First of all thank you for this report because I was expecting this from you. Let me clear one thing before you, there is a rule that we have to follow that we can only allocate 3 booming votes to the users in 7 days. As most of the users in our community are from Bangladesh and Pakistan who work in many other communities so they already had their booming votes filled out, mostly. That's why, we prefer to select only those users who did not receive 3 votes in last 7 days.
Another thing is that we prefer those posts which are not supported by other small curators (sc04-sc09).
In this community, curations are base of relations.
Please, don't make wrong allegations without any proof. If someone is receiving constant support than it doesn't mean that they are receiving support on relationship base. Let me make one thing clear.
So, it's totally unfair and wrong to conclude that they are getting support on the relationship basis. Because, every moderator is not the relative of these users.
Alas! You are judging the efforts of someone by just two users. Not considering the hard work that we are doing for the betterment of platform. Blaming someone is totally immoral my friend, please confirm everything before doing so.
Anyways, I again thank you for letting us know about the things that are happening. But again, these are just receiving votes for the above mentioned reasons otherwise there is not any particular attention of us towards them. But I would again say that it is not based on our planning or so. It was totally fortunate for these users and we ensure to pay more attention towards these users while nomination of Booming posts. These accounts are under our observation now.
My Greetings.
Cc: @steemcurator01
I appreciate our communities team hard work and transparency and no doubt we believe on our communities team . Hope they will continue their outstanding efforts no way what baseless negative criticism passes on them .
I agree with you. We all select the posts in out respective days and we are not doing anything unfair we are trying to support each user in our community.Does this user @tayboo and @sawera1 are the relatives of everyone in our group?
The community has different schedule dates for MODs to review articles and select publications for booming. We are paired in 2s and everyone select 3 best user after checking the quality of the post and also checking to be sure that they said user has not receive booming in the community for the week or has not exceeded the 3x booming for the week. These selections are still checked by @steemdoctor1 to be sure they meet the requirement. I guess if the users receive booming this much we can consider that as coincident and will also work hard next time to distribute the booming support to more users. Thanks for drawing our attention to this.
This will only be true if the booming nominations are in the hands of one person. I agree with @steemdoctor1 that booming posts are selected individually by one member on his day. Also, we are the ones that always follow the Steemit Team rule, which states that a user can get a maximum of 3 booming votes in a week, so we always follow it. We always support valid users that meet the Steemit Team rules, like being plagiarism-free, bot-free, active club members, and verified users. And In Steem for Pakistan I have not the charge of selecting booming posts.
For the account verification that some respectable members are connecting with my name, I think vidio call is the best option.